Peer-Reviewed Journal Details
Mandatory Fields
Hone, M;Nugent, AP;Walton, J;McNulty, BA;Egan, B
2020
January
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Habitual protein intake, protein distribution patterns and dietary sources in Irish adults with stratification by sex and age
Published
3 ()
Optional Fields
RESISTANCE EXERCISE HEALTHY OLDER ANABOLIC RESPONSE SYNTHESIS RATES ENERGY-INTAKE WHEY-PROTEIN LEAN MASS MUSCLE CONSUMPTION INGESTION
Background Given the importance of habitual dietary protein intake, distribution patterns and dietary sources in the aetiology of age-related declines of muscle mass and function, the present study examined these factors as a function of sex and age in Irish adults aged 18-90 years comprising The National Adult Nutrition Survey (NANS). Methods In total, 1051 (males, n = 523; females, n = 528) undertook a 4-day semi-weighed food diary. Total, body mass relative intake and percentage contribution to total energy intake of dietary protein were determined in addition to protein distribution scores (PDS), as well as the contribution of food groups, animal- and plant-based foods to total protein intake. Results Total and relative protein intake [mean (SD)] were highest in those aged 18-35 years [96 (3) g day(-1), 1.32 (0.40) g kg(-1 )day(-1)], with lower protein intakes with increasing age (i.e. in adults aged >= 65 years [82 (22) g, 1.15 (0.34) g kg(-1) day(-1), P < 0.001 for both]. Differences in protein intake between age groups were more pronounced in males compared to females. Protein distribution followed a skewed pattern for all age groups [breakfast, 15 (10) g; lunch, 30 (15) g; dinner, 44 (17) g]. Animal-based foods were the dominant protein source within the diet [63% (11%) versus 37% (11%) plant protein, P < 0.001]. Conclusions Protein intake and the number of meals reaching the purported threshold for maximising post-prandial anabolism were highest in young adults, and lower with increasing age. For main meals, breakfast provided the lowest quantity of protein across all age categories and may represent an opportunity for improving protein distribution, whereas, in older adults, increasing the number of meals reaching the anabolic threshold regardless of distribution pattern may be more appropriate.
HOBOKEN
0952-3871
10.1111/jhn.12736
Grant Details