The  presentation  focuses  mainly  on  the  methodology  and 
findings  of  a  study  that  investigated  the  belief  that  the 
Leaving Certificate is “all rote learning 
and memory recall.” 
The key research questions were:
●
What intellectual skills and knowledge domains are assessed 
in the examination papers in the subjects included in the study?
●
What  intellectual  skills  should  be  developed  by  students  of 
the  Leaving  Ce
rtificate,  based  on  the  developmental  capacities 
and challenges of students in the 16 
–
19 age group?
The study was exploratory based on the assumption that the 
reality  studied,  that  is  interpretation  for  intellectual  skill,  is 
socially  constructed.  The  fi
ndings  of  the  study  are  proffered 
as  interpreted,  contextual  knowledge  with  the  subjective 
limitations that this implies. The presentation provides a brief 
summary  of  key  points  from  the  literature  search.  A  brief 
rationale  for  document  analysis  and  studen
t  interviews  is 
presented.   228   command   verbs   were   collected   and   a 
software programme used to locate instances of the verbs in 
the   written   examination   papers   for   23   subjects.   The 
Anderson    and    Krathwohl    (2001)    taxonomy    with    six 
categories  of  intellectual  ski
ll  and  four  knowledge  domains 
was  then  used  to  assign  values  to  14,910  instances  of  the 
verbs. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences was then 
used  to  analyse  the  frequencies  of  intellectual  skill  and 
knowledge   domains   in   the   examination   papers.   Thirt
y 
students  who  had  just  completed  the  Leaving  Certificate 
were  interviewed  with  a  view  to  having  them  recall  their 
thought   processes   while   they   were   sitting   the   written 
examinations   in   ten   subject   areas.   The   findings   of   the 
document analyses and student in
terviews were reviewed in 
light  of  the  literature  search.  This  review  revealed  concerns 
which culminated in several recommendations for curriculum 
design and assessment